The Complex Dynamics of Networking Among African American Women on LinkedIn

Networking is an essential aspect of professional growth, fostering connections, and promoting career advancement. In an era dominated by digital platforms such as LinkedIn, the opportunity to connect with professionals from diverse backgrounds is unprecedented. However, it is disheartening to observe that some African American women on LinkedIn may not always proactively support networking with others of their race who they don’t personally know or share affiliations like sororities. While it is important to avoid making sweeping generalizations about any group, it’s worth acknowledging that such dynamics exist in some cases.

The phenomenon you describe may not be unique to African American women but can be observed across various demographics and professional circles. It stems from a mix of factors, including personal preferences, unconscious biases, and perceptions of competition.

One plausible explanation is that some individuals, regardless of their racial background, tend to be cautious about networking with strangers online. They may prioritize connections that have a more personal or direct relevance to their current professional goals or interests. This selective approach isn’t necessarily rooted in discrimination but rather in the pursuit of meaningful and mutually beneficial connections.

However, it is true that gatekeeping and reluctance to support networking opportunities within minority communities can hinder progress. Historically, marginalized groups have faced challenges in accessing opportunities, and fostering a sense of solidarity can be a powerful way to address these disparities. Some research indeed suggests that African Americans have had to overcome unique hurdles in networking due to systemic racism and bias within the professional world.

Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach. Encouraging African American women to support each other in networking endeavors is essential for overcoming historical and structural barriers. Educational initiatives, mentorship programs, and awareness campaigns can help foster a sense of community and shared goals among African American professionals.

In conclusion, it’s important to recognize that networking dynamics are complex and multifaceted. While some African American women may appear hesitant to connect with others on LinkedIn, attributing this solely to competition or colonialism oversimplifies the issue. Instead, promoting inclusivity, solidarity, and mentorship within the African American community can help break down barriers and create more equitable networking opportunities for all.

photo of white and purple painting

There's Nothing Good About Banning Books - But In The U.S. Its Business As Usual

April  19th, 2023

The United States has a complicated history with book banning, censorship, and challenges to books in public libraries and schools.


Book banning and censorship date back to the colonial era, when the Puritans banned books that they considered immoral or heretical. During the 19th century, books such as Harriet Beecher Stowe’s “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” and Mark Twain’s “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” were banned for their perceived controversial content. In the 20th century, book banning and censorship continued, particularly during the Cold War era, when books deemed to be sympathetic to communism or anti-American were often banned or censored. During the 1950s, books such as Ray Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451” and J.D. Salinger’s “The Catcher in the Rye” were banned or challenged for their perceived subversive content.


In the 1980s and 1990s, the focus of book banning and censorship shifted to books that dealt with controversial topics such as sexuality, race, and religion. Books such as Toni Morrison’s “Beloved,” Maya Angelou’s “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings,” and J.K. Rowling’s “Harry Potter” series were among the most frequently challenged books in public libraries and schools. In recent years, book banning and censorship have continued to be contentious issues, particularly in light of the rise of social media and the ease with which individuals can spread misinformation and false narratives. Nevertheless, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the freedom of speech and expression, and courts have consistently struck down attempts to ban books and restrict access to information.


The issue of book banning has been a contentious one in the United States for decades, with some arguing that certain books should be

books should be banned or censored in order to protect children from inappropriate content, while others argue that such bans infringe on freedom of speech and the right to access information. Data on the percentage of people supporting book banning versus those who do not is difficult to come by, as opinions on this issue can vary depending on the specific book or context. However, several surveys and studies have attempted to gauge public opinion on this issue.


One such survey, conducted by the American Library Association (ALA) in 2020, found that the majority of respondents (73%) believed that people should have the right to read whatever they want, without government interference or censorship.This suggests that the idea of book banning is not widely supported in the United States, at least among those surveyed.  However, the same survey also found that nearly half of respondents (45%) believed that certain books should be banned in schools and libraries if they were deemed to be inappropriate for children. This suggests that while many people may support the idea of freedom of speech and access to information, they may also believe that certain materials should be restricted in certain contexts. It’s also worth noting that opinions on book banning can be highly influenced by political and ideological factors. For example, a study published in the Journal of Intellectual Freedom and Privacy in 2018 found that Republicans were more likely than Democrats to support the banning of certain books, particularly those that were perceived as having leftist or progressive viewpoints.  


Overall, while the data on public opinion regarding book banning in the United States is unbalanced, it suggests that the majority of Americans support the right to read whatever they want without government interference.

Predicting The Future Of Health Care

Read The Article

Solverwp- WordPress Theme and Plugin